Because I feel this is so very important, I am reiterating what I said in my previous post to highlight it here all by itself.
I am stating for the record that I hate the vile idea of any person using a sock puppet to perpetrate anonymous abuse. I would adore to think that it wasn’t so. However, the abuse happened to me. That is undisputed. The only disputement is who perpetrated it. If fig367 didn’t do it, then I have every reason to want to know who did.
I give you my personal guarantee that if anybody has any evidence whatsoever refuting my findings that dunravin2002 is fig367‘s sock puppet, then
- I will welcome that evidence.
- I will happily publish that evidence here on this blog.
- I will as immediately as possible
- publish a retraction on this blog
- publish an itemised list on this blog correcting every inaccuracy and error I have made on this topic, if the wronged parties desire it
- take down or modify every post which contains these inaccuracies
- publicly acknowledge my responsibility on this blog for everything I have published here
- publish a formal apology on this blog to both fig367 and dunravin2002
And I personally guarantee that I will publish all of that here on this blog with the utmost pleasure. Until then, as I always do,
I absolutely stand by everything I publish here.