Oh sure – take me, for example.

I admit that I’ve spent time on this which I might more profitably have invested in thwacking consenting people with stuff.

There’s a lesson in here someplace…

And whilst using the whole chicken may indeed be kinkier than using a single feather, Irving might not count as a whole chicken (he’s full of air inside for squeezing purposes).   And he’s a rubber chicken, so he doesn’t have feathers anyhow.   And if Irving were a rubber fetishist, then by definition he’d also be a canniballist.

I would also dispute the idea that using a pervertible for kink makes it any more perverse or kinky in and of itself than it was before.

In short, I won’t have anybody impugning Irving, so there!  (even if they aren’t actually impugning him)

I admit that I’ve spent time on this which I might more profitably have invested in thwacking consenting people with stuff.   Oh well.   :)

And how innocent could he possibly be? Didn’t you ever hear the adage “Erotic is using a feather. Kinky is using the whole chicken”?

*snerk!*

As if there are any innocents in this neighborhood.

Have you recovered from the pervery I mean,  purity  test yet?   :p