<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;This Is You&#8221; &#8211; Outtakes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ladylubyanka.wordpress.com/2008/06/09/this-is-you-outtakes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ladylubyanka.wordpress.com/2008/06/09/this-is-you-outtakes/</link>
	<description>Food, Flogging, And Rubber Chickens.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:42:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Haldo Longwidget</title>
		<link>http://ladylubyanka.wordpress.com/2008/06/09/this-is-you-outtakes/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Haldo Longwidget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ladylubyanka.wordpress.com/?p=267#comment-959</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I&#039;ve never really got the hang of RSS, plus to a certain extent I dislike the whole automatedness of such things.  The internet is impersonal enough as it is without having a gizmo telling me I out to not be a lazy arse and go look at a friend&#039;s blog.  Of course, that sentiment might just be inertia masquerading as a pseudo-moral principle.

It&#039;s an intriguing possibility that you might have hypnotized me to agree with you without my noticing, but I feel very confident that you would never do such a thing: your ethical standards about consent are too firmly drawn, it seems.  And let&#039;s face it, I wish more people showed the same level of integrity.

You&#039;re most welcome, if you feel validated by my comments about your ranty goodness.  As I said earlier, the &#039;net tends to be impersonal.  Your rants, along with your superb use of language are anything but impersonal.  How can such be boring?

I think I&#039;m thick skinned enough not to take any forthcoming rant about easy-goingness personally.  It might be useful for you to note that that I use the term &quot;easy-going&quot; to give an indication of where I my threshold for being discomfited by something is.  In general, I can put up with a lot that annoys me or makes me uncomfortable before I&#039;ll feel compelled to get stroppy about it.   Why don&#039;t I get stroppy sooner?  Perhaps I&#039;m just lazy or conditioned by all of that polite waiting inline my parents insisted on when I was a nipper.

And talking of little nippers, the spawning is due anytime in the next three weeks.  And I&#039;ll continue lurking about your page never fear, so don&#039;t think you&#039;ve got rid of me yet!  And both of us thank you for your good wishes for the impending event.

All the Best,

Haldo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I&#8217;ve never really got the hang of RSS, plus to a certain extent I dislike the whole automatedness of such things.  The internet is impersonal enough as it is without having a gizmo telling me I out to not be a lazy arse and go look at a friend&#8217;s blog.  Of course, that sentiment might just be inertia masquerading as a pseudo-moral principle.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an intriguing possibility that you might have hypnotized me to agree with you without my noticing, but I feel very confident that you would never do such a thing: your ethical standards about consent are too firmly drawn, it seems.  And let&#8217;s face it, I wish more people showed the same level of integrity.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re most welcome, if you feel validated by my comments about your ranty goodness.  As I said earlier, the &#8216;net tends to be impersonal.  Your rants, along with your superb use of language are anything but impersonal.  How can such be boring?</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m thick skinned enough not to take any forthcoming rant about easy-goingness personally.  It might be useful for you to note that that I use the term &#8220;easy-going&#8221; to give an indication of where I my threshold for being discomfited by something is.  In general, I can put up with a lot that annoys me or makes me uncomfortable before I&#8217;ll feel compelled to get stroppy about it.   Why don&#8217;t I get stroppy sooner?  Perhaps I&#8217;m just lazy or conditioned by all of that polite waiting inline my parents insisted on when I was a nipper.</p>
<p>And talking of little nippers, the spawning is due anytime in the next three weeks.  And I&#8217;ll continue lurking about your page never fear, so don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ve got rid of me yet!  And both of us thank you for your good wishes for the impending event.</p>
<p>All the Best,</p>
<p>Haldo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lady Lubyanka</title>
		<link>http://ladylubyanka.wordpress.com/2008/06/09/this-is-you-outtakes/#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>Lady Lubyanka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ladylubyanka.wordpress.com/?p=267#comment-953</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Oh gosh! I think there’s nothing going to be posted here because you’re all blogged out and there’s a pair of whoppers laid out before me when I look. [...] Note to self: take more personal responsibility and check here for updates more often.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There, you see what you miss when you don&#039;t pay attention? &#160; ;) &#160; Just keeping you on your toes. &#160; Either that, or I just cannot predict or control when I&#039;m going to have a rant spasm.

I reckon it&#039;s most likely the latter.

If you use an RSS feed reader, then your regular reads will be automatically updated in it, and then you won&#039;t have to manually check.
&#160; 
&#160; 
&lt;blockquote&gt;To be honest, I’m still assimilating the information in both of them, so I’m not entirely certain why I agree with you.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It could possibly be cos I hypnotised you without you noticing or consenting, and persuaded you with my evil ways to believe everything I say.

Oh, whoops, did I say that out loud? &#160; ;)
&#160; 
&#160; 
&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s not the passion with which you write, though you do write with real fire and I just love all of these posts ranty goodness. [...] And your rants are never boring (at least as far as I’m concerned), just sometimes lengthy to digest.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh, thank you, that &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;is&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; reassuring.

And validating.

To be honest, I really did feel like this rant was boring, mostly because I myself was quite bored with it quite a long time before I actually posted the thing. &#160; But maybe that was more about the process and not so much the content.

Throughout the construction of the post(s), I felt a terribly compelled to check and double check everything I said in order to ensure accuracy, I felt compelled to take extra special care that my conclusions were as accurately as possible drawn from actual statements, and I felt compelled to painstakingly ensure that the rants I expressed definitely had a verifiable basis in fact.

I think this was most probably because I was referencing specific individuals, whom I thought would quite likely (and apparently did) feel upset about what I was writing, so I thought I&#039;d better be exceptionally sure about the accuracy of what I was saying before I said it.

Either that, or I&#039;ve had &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obsessive-compulsive_disorder&quot; title=&quot;Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OCD&lt;/a&gt; all this time and not noticed &#160; &lt;i&gt;(even though these compulsions were not representative of how I felt when writing my other posts)&lt;/i&gt;.

Still, it could be that.
&#160; 
&#160; 
&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m not entirely certain that it’s the arguments you present mainly because my brain is still processing them. I’d say that I tend to instinctively dislike such attitudes. Not being you, I’m a bit more easy-going and I’ve never really analysed why.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Perhaps the attitudes don&#039;t bother you as much as they bother me?

In any case, I might have to do a separate rant about the term &quot;easy going&quot;, because my experience is that everybody is &quot;easy going&quot; until something or somebody transgresses their boundaries. &#160; At those times, &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;nobody&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; is &quot;easy going&quot;.

It&#039;s sort of like &quot;patience&quot;, because &quot;patience&quot; is only required when a person feels &quot;impatient&quot;, and not at other times. &#160; &quot;Easy going&quot; is only &quot;easy&quot; when there are few or no obstacles to it.

But I&#039;ll save that for the rant, which is nothing to do with you. &#160; :)
&#160; 
&#160; 
&lt;blockquote&gt;So thanks- I think- for once more encouraging my cerebrum to cogitate over such matters. I might confirm the thanks when the aforementioned cogitations are done with, if other matters don’t drive my gratitude from my mind.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oooh, yeah, impending spawnage! &#160; I look forward either to your further comments, or to your news that your upcoming parenthood is no longer a future dream. &#160; :)

I imagine that your parenthood will severely curtail your time with us here on the intarwebz. &#160; Even though I don&#039;t at all grudge your offspring&#039;s entitlement to your time, I for one will miss your presence here.

Please extend my best wishes to your lady for a most tolerable bodily-expunging experience, and my best wishes to both you and your offspring for health, happiness, and severely reduced neuroses.

xx Lubyanka. &#160; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Oh gosh! I think there’s nothing going to be posted here because you’re all blogged out and there’s a pair of whoppers laid out before me when I look. [...] Note to self: take more personal responsibility and check here for updates more often.</p></blockquote>
<p>There, you see what you miss when you don&#8217;t pay attention? &nbsp; ;) &nbsp; Just keeping you on your toes. &nbsp; Either that, or I just cannot predict or control when I&#8217;m going to have a rant spasm.</p>
<p>I reckon it&#8217;s most likely the latter.</p>
<p>If you use an RSS feed reader, then your regular reads will be automatically updated in it, and then you won&#8217;t have to manually check.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote><p>To be honest, I’m still assimilating the information in both of them, so I’m not entirely certain why I agree with you.</p></blockquote>
<p>It could possibly be cos I hypnotised you without you noticing or consenting, and persuaded you with my evil ways to believe everything I say.</p>
<p>Oh, whoops, did I say that out loud? &nbsp; ;)<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote><p>It’s not the passion with which you write, though you do write with real fire and I just love all of these posts ranty goodness. [...] And your rants are never boring (at least as far as I’m concerned), just sometimes lengthy to digest.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, thank you, that <i><b>is</b></i> reassuring.</p>
<p>And validating.</p>
<p>To be honest, I really did feel like this rant was boring, mostly because I myself was quite bored with it quite a long time before I actually posted the thing. &nbsp; But maybe that was more about the process and not so much the content.</p>
<p>Throughout the construction of the post(s), I felt a terribly compelled to check and double check everything I said in order to ensure accuracy, I felt compelled to take extra special care that my conclusions were as accurately as possible drawn from actual statements, and I felt compelled to painstakingly ensure that the rants I expressed definitely had a verifiable basis in fact.</p>
<p>I think this was most probably because I was referencing specific individuals, whom I thought would quite likely (and apparently did) feel upset about what I was writing, so I thought I&#8217;d better be exceptionally sure about the accuracy of what I was saying before I said it.</p>
<p>Either that, or I&#8217;ve had <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obsessive-compulsive_disorder" title="Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder" rel="nofollow">OCD</a> all this time and not noticed &nbsp; <i>(even though these compulsions were not representative of how I felt when writing my other posts)</i>.</p>
<p>Still, it could be that.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote><p>I’m not entirely certain that it’s the arguments you present mainly because my brain is still processing them. I’d say that I tend to instinctively dislike such attitudes. Not being you, I’m a bit more easy-going and I’ve never really analysed why.</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps the attitudes don&#8217;t bother you as much as they bother me?</p>
<p>In any case, I might have to do a separate rant about the term &#8220;easy going&#8221;, because my experience is that everybody is &#8220;easy going&#8221; until something or somebody transgresses their boundaries. &nbsp; At those times, <i><b>nobody</b></i> is &#8220;easy going&#8221;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s sort of like &#8220;patience&#8221;, because &#8220;patience&#8221; is only required when a person feels &#8220;impatient&#8221;, and not at other times. &nbsp; &#8220;Easy going&#8221; is only &#8220;easy&#8221; when there are few or no obstacles to it.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ll save that for the rant, which is nothing to do with you. &nbsp; :)<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote><p>So thanks- I think- for once more encouraging my cerebrum to cogitate over such matters. I might confirm the thanks when the aforementioned cogitations are done with, if other matters don’t drive my gratitude from my mind.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oooh, yeah, impending spawnage! &nbsp; I look forward either to your further comments, or to your news that your upcoming parenthood is no longer a future dream. &nbsp; :)</p>
<p>I imagine that your parenthood will severely curtail your time with us here on the intarwebz. &nbsp; Even though I don&#8217;t at all grudge your offspring&#8217;s entitlement to your time, I for one will miss your presence here.</p>
<p>Please extend my best wishes to your lady for a most tolerable bodily-expunging experience, and my best wishes to both you and your offspring for health, happiness, and severely reduced neuroses.</p>
<p>xx Lubyanka. &nbsp; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haldo Longwidget</title>
		<link>http://ladylubyanka.wordpress.com/2008/06/09/this-is-you-outtakes/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>Haldo Longwidget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ladylubyanka.wordpress.com/?p=267#comment-951</guid>
		<description>Oh gosh!  I think there&#039;s nothing going to be posted here because you&#039;re all blogged out and there&#039;s a pair of whoppers laid out before me when I look.  To be honest, I&#039;m still assimilating the information in both of them, so I&#039;m not entirely certain why I agree with you.  It&#039;s not the passion with which you write, though you do write with real fire and I just love all of these posts ranty goodness.  I&#039;m not entirely certain that it&#039;s the arguments you present mainly because my brain is still processing them.  I&#039;d say that I tend to instinctively dislike such attitudes.  Not being you, I&#039;m a bit more easy-going and I&#039;ve never really analysed why.

So thanks- I think- for once more encouraging my cerebrum to cogitate over such matters.  I might confirm the thanks when the aforementioned cogitations are done with, if other matters don&#039;t drive my gratitude from my mind.

And your rants are never boring (at least as far as I&#039;m concerned), just sometimes lengthy to digest.

Note to self: take more personal responsibility and check here for updates more often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh gosh!  I think there&#8217;s nothing going to be posted here because you&#8217;re all blogged out and there&#8217;s a pair of whoppers laid out before me when I look.  To be honest, I&#8217;m still assimilating the information in both of them, so I&#8217;m not entirely certain why I agree with you.  It&#8217;s not the passion with which you write, though you do write with real fire and I just love all of these posts ranty goodness.  I&#8217;m not entirely certain that it&#8217;s the arguments you present mainly because my brain is still processing them.  I&#8217;d say that I tend to instinctively dislike such attitudes.  Not being you, I&#8217;m a bit more easy-going and I&#8217;ve never really analysed why.</p>
<p>So thanks- I think- for once more encouraging my cerebrum to cogitate over such matters.  I might confirm the thanks when the aforementioned cogitations are done with, if other matters don&#8217;t drive my gratitude from my mind.</p>
<p>And your rants are never boring (at least as far as I&#8217;m concerned), just sometimes lengthy to digest.</p>
<p>Note to self: take more personal responsibility and check here for updates more often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
