Considering A Male Chastity Device
After all the stuff I’ve read about orgasm denial and chastity, the issue has appeared to have reared its ugly head (so to speak, lol) in my life.
When I first started with kvetch, he disclosed to me that he had a problem with addiction to porn and masturbation. When I’m with him, this isn’t an issue. When I’m away, this remains a problem for him at times.
Normally, I define a “problem” as:
- Problem: Something which interferes with usual function enough to impede or impair it.
In kvetch’s case, when I’m not around, he finds that he spends more time than he can comfortably spare looking at porn and masturbating, sometimes for hours every evening. This can prevent him from completing other tasks.
Last time I saw him (oy vey, post about that may possibly be in the works) he suggested to me that chastity might be helpful for this issue. We were in a shop buying me a new pain toy to use on him, and whilst there, had a look at the CB-3000 which was on display in a glass case. There was also a stainless steel chastity device.
I didn’t really like the look of either of them, but the whole idea is rather hot. ;) I like the idea of holding the key to his genitals, a lot. :)
There are an unbelievable number of male chastity devices out there. The choice and variety is bewilderingly huge. That review site helped a great deal to clarify what it was I was actually shopping for.
Priorities
After having read a whole lot of reviews of people’s experiences with chastity devices on their cocks, a pattern seemed to be emerging regarding the importance of certain elements:
- The Fit: From the reviews I read, it seems that the number one super duper urgent priority, is the fit. It seems that without a really excellent fit, the rest of the features don’t really matter.
Some have hinges which may pinch, some have rivets which may chafe, some have seams which may irritate. Whether sanding, shaving with a knife, and/or covering things with surgical tape, it seems that every single one of them requires some customisation in order to get it fitting just so and without irritation or injury of any kind. What a faff.
And since the fit varies so much what with people being all shapes and sizes and everything, reviews tended to go more on the comfort and security of the fit than on almost anything else. As a result, it’s really difficult to choose which chastity device will work the best for kvetch’s own size and shape. Clearly what works well for one will not necessarily work well for all, most, or even any others.
Getting one custom made by a local artisan would seem to be one option. But since there aren’t any local artisans who make these in Ireland as far as I could find, it would be necessary to travel and make a whole holiday around getting a chastity device fitted, made, adjusted, and finalised. Also there would be the aftercare, customer service, and subsequent adjustments to consider. This does not seem to me to be an optimal solution for us.
But fortunately, since kvetch is circumcised, many of the reviews I read indicated that male chastity devices are much easier to use with circumcised cocks than they are with penises which have intact foreskins. So, that’s one small mercy. :)
- Design: Mostly I saw two basic designs for male chastity devices, either ones with a waist belt, and cock and ball cages with no waist belt. I have to say I much prefer the idea of something without a waist belt, although I couldn’t say why. I think it might be partly because I prefer the idea of kvetch wearing as little as possible (being a big fan of CFNM), and a belt just seems to make the whole thing more like clothing.
There was a greater variation in the cock tubes than I would have at first imagined. Some were open ended, some had a simple bar on the end, some were closed on the end with just a hole for urination, some had several bars on the end, some had just a gap with no bars. Really, there are some very creative designers of chastity devices out there.
Unfortunately, some chastity device designer/makers come and go with tiresome regularity. In some cases, the designer dies and that’s the end of the business. In other cases the designer goes out of business, and then with no warning reopens again. Some businesses have to close temporarily due to personal issues. Because it seems that this kind of business is never going to be a really huge profit generating financial monster, the business itself would appear to be as reliable as the individual running it. There’s nobody around to take up the slack if something happens to the business owner.
There were a few really attractive looking devices out there which are no longer made. That was frustrating. But still, life goes on. :)
- Escape Proof: Apparently some of these male chastity devices are relatively easy to escape from if the fit isn’t quite right, or if a person is of a certain size and/or shape, even if it’s not quite as straightforward to sneak back into the device again afterwards. This would appear to kind of defeat the purpose of a chastity device in the first place.
Also, some are designed to be secured either only with a piercing, or in addition to a piercing, or without a piercing. My kvetch isn’t pierced at the moment, so he’d need one which can be secure without the need for a piercing
- Urination: It would seem that for many of these male chastity devices, urination is best achieved sitting on the loo, otherwise things may get a bit messy. This is possibly an inconvenience for them. However, this is possibly some source of satisfaction for me. :p
“So now you know what it’s like, hah, see how you like it, so there, nyah!”
- Lube: Apparently, the best way to put on the male chastity device is to lube up the shaft of the penis and the scrotal area, and ease the ring and tube on using a cotton bud to keep any skin from getting pinched in the small areas where skin might get pinched.
Also apparently it’s a good idea to apply some lube to the penis with a cotton bud whilst wearing the chastity device, after showering, to keep the skin in good condition.
There would also appear to be something called “the stocking trick”, for getting into the device.
This seems to involve putting a stocking over the shaft of the penis, threading the other end of the stocking through the bottom of the chastity device tube, using the stocking to pull the shaft of the penis down into the bottom of the tube, and then pulling the stocking off the shaft of the penis and through the tube, removing it completely. This can apparently create some difficulties if the owner of the penis is aroused by stockings. :p So it may be recommended not to put the stocking over the entire shaft of the penis, but perhaps only over part of it.
- Materials: Essentially there seem to be two types of materials used in male chastity device manufacture, varieties of composite polycarbonate plastic material, and varieties of steel, with some occasional bits of aluminium thrown in, in some cases.
Aesthetically, the male chastity devices aren’t, on the whole, works of art. Well, not to me, anyhow. They don’t dress up the male genital area in the way that, say, haute couture does. And at the prices of some of them, that’s a bit of a shame. But since I’m far more interested in function, rather than form, I don’t find that much of a problem.
The few I have seen which do look pretty nifty all seem to be made from some kind of steel, which just isn’t suitable when considering airport security and things like that. So it had to be the composite polycarbonate, since I don’t want my keyholding style cramped in any way by having to take the thing off if there’s any security arrangements in the form of metal detectors. The ones in airports are pretty damn sensitive. And, you know, Ireland, security, all that stuff. One never knows when one is going to run into a metal detector.
So, composite polycarbonate plastic material for me.
- Extras: I looked at a lot of male chastity devices, and they all seemed to have extra stuff which could be added on as optional extras, whether it be different locks, permanently closing locks, different types of belt, different types of piercing security attachments, security add ons such as teeth and rings, the list goes on. It seems it just isn’t practical or possible to get a single all in one package that works, because of the individual sizing issues involved.
Which is a bit of a bummer, actually. Just a little bit inconvenient. But until this niche market is served as it deserves, I don’t suppose this situation will improve at all.
One unexpected recommendation for an extra came from a review from a police officer in the southern United States. He said he used a product on his chastity device called Rain-X on his device to help keep it dry after urination and showering. Pending a patch test on the skin to find out if there are any adverse reactions, I think that sounds like a splendid idea. :)
The Decisions
After much consideration, and reading of reviews, and looking at pictures, and considering features and design and stuff, I finally worked out that the only practical way to experiment is to actually buy one of these things and try it out.
This is just ever so slightly disappointing, because male chastity devices are quite expensive, and trying out even one, if it doesn’t do the job, can hardly be cost effective.
I did a lot of considering over a week of research trying to work out what was best. I even asked kvetch if he’d get a piercing if I asked him to. But that seemed a bit extreme, getting pierced just for a chastity device. Maybe it isn’t so extreme, but for a first attempt, it seems kind of a large step. So:
- Decision 1: No Piercing
- Decision 2: Composite polycarbonate plastic material
- Decision 3: A product from an established company which can provide adequate customer service
- Decision 4: A more or less ready-to-wear device and not a bespoke item
- Decision 5: Bite the bullet and get the extras
And so, having researched and read and looked at pictures and read more reviews and yet more reviews, I finally decided.
And The Winning Choice Is….
- The Curve Male Chastity Kit
- The Curve Points Of Intrigue
- KSD-G2 The Curve Chastity Anti Pull-Out Attachment
- CB Plastic Locks 10 Pack
Today I ordered everything from Lovehoney except the chastity kit, as it was the only thing which wasn’t in stock. So I ordered that from ChastityPlay, which I’ve never used before. It looks like a good site though.
Everything is due to arrive this week.
Even my uber cool new flogger order (kvetch is getting me a new moose and some other yummies {some of which are vegan} for my birthday) is due to be finished and ready to ship this week, which is great, because I’ve got another one of those BDSM-themed nights coming up, and I’m due to be interviewing a prospective submissive soon as well.
Ooooooh, exciting times, yummy! :D
I’ll do a post on the new floggy goodnesses when they arrive. :)
And I’ll post updates on the chastity situation too, as I’m heading down to see kvetch with all the new goodies in a couple of weeks.
I feel like today has been a pretty good day. :)



















14 responses so far ↓
Tom Allen // Monday, 1 October, 2007 at 22:30:04 |
The single biggest complaint about the Curve is that it’s bulky and not easily hidden under normal street clothes, and shows up even more under tight jeans.
Somewhere on the net are instructions on how to modify the Curve by cutting out a section from the middle in order to shorten it a bit to make it more passable. Kvetch might want to look into that.
I’ll speak from experience that a frenum piercing might not be the best kind for wearing with these devices; in fact, several people recommended a PA to me, but I chose to ignore them. A year of difficulties in fitting my frenum barbell to the CB3k, though, has changed my mind.
Lady Lubyanka // Monday, 1 October, 2007 at 22:41:00 |
Thank you Tom, those all sound like great tips. :)
I’ll have a look around for Curve mods which don’t require a degree in engineering or specialist tools. :)
Sorry to hear about the difficulties you’ve had with your barbell. Have you considered putting a ring in your frenum instead?
Tom Allen // Tuesday, 2 October, 2007 at 02:41:02 |
Actually, I didn’t ask why you’d chosen the Curve instead of the CB3000 or the new CB6000. Both are more passable under street clothes – I can wear my 3k under suits, jeans, even bathing suits – the baggy kind.
Have you considered putting a ring in your frenum instead?
Funny you should ask – I just posted last week that I swapped out the barbell for a captive segment ring. It stretched me a bit, and the sharp edge sort of scraped me a little, but it’s getting more comfy. We’re itching to try it out.
Lady Lubyanka // Tuesday, 2 October, 2007 at 05:05:26 |
“Actually, I didn’t ask why you’d chosen the Curve instead of the CB3000 or the new CB6000. Both are more passable under street clothes – I can wear my 3k under suits, jeans, even bathing suits – the baggy kind.”
Based on the reviews and information I read, my primary concern wasn’t being unobtrusive under clothes. Getting an adequate, comfortable, safe and secure fit was my number one priority.
When reading people’s personal experiences, it seemed that one of the issues with the CB3000 which was resolved with the Curve was an issue experienced by people with larger cocks. Kvetch has a cock which tends to be pretty sizeable when not erect, and indeed has quite a heft to it when even partially erect. People had written about problems with the CB3000 and larger cocks.
Also in those reviews, some individuals said that the Curve was unobtrusive under their clothes, even lycra cycling shorts, though some said it showed a lot. But based on what I read, the strong impression I got was that the Curve would fit kvetch much better than the CB3000. I found less information about the CB6000, and anyhow, it seemed to have similar internal dimensions to the CB3000.
So, that was a lot to do with why I chose the Curve and not either of the others.
Actually, I was quite attracted to this pretty thing, but it’s steel unfortunately, so no good for metal detectors.
I’m interested to hear you’ve just swapped over to the captive ring. I look forward to hearing more about your frenal adventures. :)
(come to that, I can’t wait to find out how my adventures in male chastity go, hehe)
nigel // Tuesday, 9 October, 2007 at 03:13:40 |
Wow ! you guys get all the fun.
However is it possible that male chastity devices are a male ruse to focus attention on the penis rather than on the vulva? and by doing so, clandestinely undermine Female Dominance?
The “cod-piece” in Tudor clothing fashion, is my argument’s precedent.
Lady Lubyanka // Tuesday, 9 October, 2007 at 08:26:00 |
Hello Nigel,
Thanks for dropping by. I find I’m unable to make any sense out of your question.
Why would some focus on one thing necessarily result in less focus on another?
Why would anything I do, or kvetch does, reflect on, influence, or indeed have anything to do with male chastity devices in general, or “male ruses” in general, or “Female Dominance” as a whole?
Obviously I wouldn’t be aware of anything which was clandestine enough to escape my notice.
You made an argument? What argument?
Your precedent is illustrating what presupposition?
What do cod-pieces or Tudor fashion have to do with any of this?
I’m lost.
Tom Allen // Thursday, 11 October, 2007 at 02:09:58 |
I think that what Nigel is asking is whether or not a focus on the devices is a substitute for a focus on the penis themselves. That is, when men start comparing notes on the devices, modifying them, adjusting, cleaning, etc., it seems to be some kind of effort, or perhaps, a ruse in which their partner has to pay more attention to their penis than she would normally.
In response, I think that Nigel should spend a couple of weeks in a CB3k with someone who lives very, very far away holding the key.
Lady Lubyanka // Thursday, 11 October, 2007 at 02:37:08 |
Thank you for the clarification, Tom. :)
I think that it’s fairly obvious that I can’t comment with any certainty on what other people do, or why they do it. Not that this stops me, sometimes, in some categories, but I don’t feel comfortable commenting on general behaviours in this category, as I simply don’t know.
If there are any ruses to focus my attention more on the cock than I might otherwise do, I’m not aware of them. I don’t prefer to participate in those sorts of games.
If an increase of my focus is desired on my submissive’s cock, then they may simply say so, and I will consider it. I would regard that as a topic suitable for negotiation, and negotiate it.
If men in general are using chastity in general as a ruse to increase their own focus on their own cocks, then that is for them to work out. I have little interest in the topic.
This question spawns the further query as to whether a question like this is in fact a passive aggressive attempt to draw me personally into increasing my own focus on Nigel’s particular cock.
And my verdict on that is, possibly, or possibly not. As I have little interest in that topic, I won’t be spending any time on it.
Best regards,
Lubyanka.
Tom Allen // Thursday, 11 October, 2007 at 16:40:01 |
If there are any ruses to focus my attention more on the cock than I might otherwise do, I’m not aware of them. I don’t prefer to participate in those sorts of games.
I sort of understand the point he was trying to make, although I disagree with it.
In some respects, all the fussing with the devices does focus a lot of attention on your penis. In addition, some people play games of chance, indulge in point systems, and in fact, do end up making the game more about the orgasm than the denial. IMHBCO, of course.
Lady Lubyanka // Thursday, 11 October, 2007 at 16:53:18 |
“In some respects, all the fussing with the devices does focus a lot of attention on your penis.”
Yes, I do get that. I’m just not sure whether the fussing with the device won’t solely increase kvetch’s focus on his own penis (which I have no problem with, at the moment), as opposed to increasing my focus on it (which I don’t imagine happening at this stage).
“In addition, some people play games of chance, indulge in point systems, and in fact, do end up making the game more about the orgasm than the denial.”
I don’t do points systems of any kind, nor do I play games of chance. I can’t imagine modifying those behaviours for the sake of the device. I have my methods with kvetch, and they do not include any games of that nature.
“IMHBCO, of course.”
Is that: “In My Humble But Considered Opinion”?
Any of those things which you mentioned above may certainly affect other people. But since those other people are nothing to do with me, and since I am not in fact those other people, I couldn’t address any questions involving them.
I do very much appreciate your clarifying the viewpoint, thank you Tom. :)
Lubyanka. :)
4 January 2008: **Update**
After some (somewhat) delayed googlage, I have found that “IMHBCO” is most definitely an acronym for:
“In My Humble But Correct Opinion”.
Just to let everybody know I did find it in the end. :)
**End Of Update**
Experiences In Chastity - Episode 1: Fitting, Wearing, and Keyholding. « Lady Lubyanka // Monday, 24 December, 2007 at 22:24:35 |
[...] 24 December, 2007 · No Comments Three months ago, I wrote this post about embarking on the wonderful world of chastity with my submissive (more commonly known as my [...]
Jeff // Wednesday, 2 January, 2008 at 00:06:13 |
Great job selecting the Curve.Once Kvetch has found the right sized cuffing ring I would suggest you replace the hinged cuffing with a solid ring compatible with the curve.Comfort level soars.I’m locked in a cb3k with a solid ring and it wears like a breeze.In fact I feel insecure out of my cb3k.
Lady Lubyanka // Friday, 4 January, 2008 at 06:58:38 |
Hello Jeff,
I’m sure I’ll be considering the possibility of acquiring a solid ring as soon as I’m sure that the size 1 ring is the most appropriate size for kvetch’s long term wear. There has been much written on the difficulties people have had with the hinged rings.
I’ve been keeping the hinge covered, and so far we have experienced no hinge related issues with skin irritation or pinching or sores. And the hinge does allow the ring to be put on around the scrotum and shaft more easily.
Thank you for stopping by. :)
Best regards,
Lubyanka.
Bigging Up The Aeropress « Lady Lubyanka // Monday, 1 December, 2008 at 12:11:29 |
[...] addition to other delicious polycarbonate accessories which brighten up my life, the Aeropress is the single most useful coffee gadget I’ve ever [...]